Blogsbite’s intrepid reporter Rab El’ Ais, whose beat is usually the Middle East has snagged an interview with Ass.Ass.Ass. DA Snorri Kelson of Low-Low, CA. when he happened upon the Ass.Ass.Ass. DA in a bar outside of Low-Low, with a woman who he claimed he was helping. He is very helpful.
Ass.Ass.Ass. DA Snorri Kelson is best known for his diminuitive stature, and second best known for his hatred of anything spitball, and third best known for being helpful to anyone against spitballs.
Rab: “If you’re ready, I’ll turn on the recorder, and we can start.”
A.A.A.DA SK: “Is this my good side?”
Rab: “Er..sure. Let’s do a bit of background, I understand that in 1996 you were against chews, and chewers, is that correct?’
A.A.A.DA SK: “Yes, but I have learned that as bad as chews, and chewers are, spitballs, and spitballers are worse. They must be eradicated.”
Rab: “Tell me more about chews, and chewers, and then we will move on to spitballs, I’d like our readers to see the progression, if that is alright with you?”
A.A.A.DA SK: “Back in the 1990’s chews, and chewing was popular in Low-Low. In fact it was the most popular pastime. I did an interview then calling for people to recognize the threat of chews, but nobody listened. Well, they are listening now that spitballs have become so popular. We hardly hear about chews anymore.”
Rab: “You worked hard to get spitballs banned from Low-Low didn’t you?
A.A.A.DA SK: “Yes, and I’m redoubling my efforts to have spitballs banned from everyplace. We have been sued. We have been reviled. I will not be denied my spitball ban. Low-Low is too good for spitballs, and their spitters”
Rab: “Could you tell our readers a bit about your efforts?”
A.A.A.DA SK: “Yes. I have set up alerts with Goggle, and Youhoo that alert me to all spitball stories in the news. If a city is considering a ban on spitballs, I send the city council, and city attorney a letter offering my help. I’m very helpful. If I see a story about a vicious spitball attack I call the victim, and offer my help. I’m very helpful.”
Rab: “Could you give us some insight as to the victims that you have helped, or are helping?”
A.A.A.DA SK: “I suppose it couldn’t hurt. Two that come to mind are Lassie Nyll of Seattle who loves to see her name in print. I contacted her following an alleged spitball attack while she was jogging. She is such a brave, albeit weird looking, woman of great computer skills. She has created the site spitballshitthatswhattheydo.org and has founded Families and Pets Against Spitballs, with my help, of course. I’m very helpful. Let’s see, there is also Ms. Gloriosity Puff a victim from Smalltown, Iowa whose career as a mime was shattered by a spitball attack while she was working. After the attack Ms. Puff found her voice, and it is cying out, ‘We will rid Iowa of all spitballs.’ She has founded the Iowa Coalition of Mimes Against Spitballs, with my help. I’m very helpful.”
Rab: “I understand that the spitballers have a nick name for you, is that true?”
A.A.A.DA SK: “Yes. I proudly wear the name, Dr. Death to Spitballs.”
Rab: It is my understanding that you have said that there is no constitutional right to own spitballs, is this correct?
A.A.A.DA SK: Yes, I have said it, and I’ll say it again. There is no constitutional right to own spitballs.”
Rab: “What about Amendment IV. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.?”
A.A.A.DA SK: What? Are you a graduate of law school? Do you actually believe that you are capable of reading, understanding, and applying the writings of the Constitution of the United States of America? You, a simple journalist? Don’t make me scoff!! You must be insane!! You are certainly weird looking!”
Rab: “The IV amendment actually mentions papers. Wouldn’t the average person understand that to mean that he, or she is allowed to have spitballs should he or she wish to do so?
A.A.A.DA SK: “What? Are you crazy? That is not what the constitution says. People are only allowed to have the rights that government gives them! If the government says no spitballs, then there will be no spitballs.”
Rab: “Excuse me, you have a bit of spittle on your upper lip.”
A.A.A.DA SK: “No I don’t!! Don’t you ever say that again! Let’s get on with this interview. I haven’t finished helping that woman I was with.
Rab: “Are you telling our readers that we can only have items that are explicitly spelled out in the Constitution? I guess that paper although mentioned isn’t one of those things, is that correct?”
“No. I’m telling you that people can only have what I say they can have. I say they can’t have spitballs, or chews, or some breath fresheners.”
Rab: ” What is your take on Amendment IX The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. ?
A.A.A.DA SK: “Are you crazy? That doesn’t mean anything. You do not know how to determine the useful stuff from the non-useful stuff. That is best left up to a professional Ass.Ass.Ass. DA like me. Interview over.”
I wiped the spittle off of the recorder’s microphone as I watched Ass.Ass.Ass. DA Snorri Kelson stomp away in his little tiny shoes to help the woman who had been patiently waiting at the bar outside of Low-Low.
Rab El’Ais